Privacy Commissioner’s Annual Report confirms that system is broken when it comes to Bill C-51 and CSE metadata sharing
September 27, 2016
September 27, 2016 - The federal Privacy Commissioner’s annual report has raised serious concerns about how the controversial information disclosure provisions in Bill C-51 have been implemented. The report also found that the Communications Security Establishment’s (CSE) practice of sharing metadata with its Five Eyes partners undermines the privacy of Canadians, and proposed legislative changes to address the problem.
The publication of the report comes just weeks after the government announced a nationwide consultation on a broad range of privacy and security issues. In his report, Commissioner Therrien criticized the government’s framing of these issues, stating that the tone “focuses heavily on challenges to law enforcement” and that Canadians need to hear about the implications “for democratic rights and privacy.” Civic society groups, including OpenMedia, have levelled similar criticisms.
“When it comes to both Bill C-51 and CSE spying, it’s clear the system is broken,” said OpenMedia’s communications manager David Christopher. “Since Bill C-51 was first announced, experts have warned about the damage these information sharing provisions would cause to the privacy and security of Canadians. And we’ve known for years that metadata sharing risks exposing the most intimate details of our private lives. It’s commendable to see the Privacy Commissioner sound the alarm about these issues.”
Christopher continued: “The previous government took an ‘act now, think later’ approach to Bill C-51 and CSE mass surveillance, and nearly a year into the new government’s term we’re still waiting for the fix. It’s also clear the government stumbled badly in designing a national security consultation that even its own Privacy Commissioner says is skewed. All in all, this report reinforces the need for a complete overhaul of our privacy rules if we’re to keep Canadians safe from invasive surveillance.”
Experts have long warned about the dangerous privacy implications of Bill C-51’s information sharing provisions, and about how metadata can expose highly sensitive details of someone’s private life, including their financial status, medical conditions, sexual orientation, and religious and political beliefs.
Key findings from the Privacy Commissioner’s annual report include:
Most government departments did not conduct Privacy Impact Assessments to evaluate the privacy implications of Bill C-51’s new information sharing powers.
Public Safety Canada failed to implement recommendations from the Privacy Commissioner about how to mitigate the privacy risks of information sharing, despite having a year to do so.
The scope of recently-announced national security consultations is too narrow and doesn’t look at key privacy concerns when it comes to Bill C-51. Commissioner Therrien also flagged concerns about the tone of the accompanying discussion paper.
A review of CSE’s metadata sharing concluded that CSE was incorrect to claim the risk to privacy was minimal, because metadata can “reveal very sensitive information about individuals’ activities, associates, interests and lives.”
Judicial authorization should be continue to be required before telecom companies disclose basic subscriber information to the government, because “an IP address can reveal a great deal about an individual” including “details of a person’s interests based on websites visited, their organizational affiliations, where they have been and the online services for which they have registered.”
Canadians can send Public Safety Minister Goodale a message that it’s time to fully repeal Bill C-51 and restore our privacy rights at https://act.openmedia.org/security.
OpenMedia works to keep the Internet open, affordable, and surveillance-free. We create community-driven campaigns to engage, educate, and empower people to safeguard the Internet.
More Press Releases
Federal Communications Commission votes to repeal Net Neutrality protections that ensure an open and equal Internet
December 14, 2017
Contact: Katy Anderson
November 21, 2017
Contact: Marie Aspiazu
European Parliament’s civil liberties committee strikes blow to dangerous proposals for content censorship
November 20, 2017
Contact: Ruth Coustick-Deal
U.S. District Court defends online free expression and principles of intermediary liability with recent decision
November 3, 2017
Contact: Katy Anderson